Why AI hasn’t killed design—it’s just moved it backstage
It was a lazy Sunday morning when I found myself in a heated debate—not with a colleague, but with a chatbot named Neo, a new AI tool my designer friend Raj had been testing.
I asked, “Neo, can you redesign this landing page to make it more premium?”
In less than 10 seconds, Neo had it ready: clean fonts, a perfect colour palette, and a layout that would make any designer nod in approval.
Raj, watching me play with it, smirked.
"See? Told you. Design is dead."
I froze.
“What?! You sound dumb,” I replied, half-joking, half-offended.
But deep down, I knew this wasn’t just a snarky remark—it was a symptom of a growing sentiment. With AI generating websites, logos, and brand identities in seconds, the internet is buzzing with this idea that designers are obsolete.
So I went on a mission: Is design really dead? Or are we just looking at it the wrong way?
Let’s rewind a bit.
There was a time when designers were like architects—they planned everything. Every pixel had to be manually crafted. Today, AI tools like Midjourney, Uizard, and Framer are doing that grunt work in minutes. Anyone can now generate a polished interface by typing a prompt.
But here’s the twist: This doesn't kill design. It just shifts where its magic happens.
Design isn't the buttons or the gradients anymore. It's what those elements make people feel. The role has evolved. Less "move this 2px left" and more "why does this exist, and who is it helping?"
Key takeaway #1:
🧠 Design is no longer the end product—it’s the invisible thinking behind it.
Let’s go back to Raj.
“Okay,” I said, “so the AI can do the design. But can it know why that screen exists? Or why the user is stuck on that step in the journey?”
He was quiet.
Designers today are becoming more like strategists, systems thinkers, and user psychologists. The tools may get you a screen, but they don’t understand the why, the who, or the what next.
We still need people to map journeys, test prototypes, define personas, and interpret messy human needs into something coherent. AI isn't replacing design—it’s just automating the output. The soul of design is still deeply human.
Key takeaway #2:
🤝 Designers are becoming bridge builders between people, technology, and business.
Here’s where it gets tricky.
If everyone can design with a prompt, what happens to quality? What about accessibility? Ethics? Inclusion?
A button placed 3px off won’t break trust. But an interface that subtly excludes or manipulates? That’s dangerous. Design has the power to shape how we behave, and if we remove the human lens, we risk creating products that are efficient—but soulless and even harmful.
Key takeaway #3:
⚠️ Design without intention leads to products without integrity.
Back at the table, Raj finally said, “Maybe design isn’t dead. It’s just... invisible now.”
Exactly. It’s in the questions we ask, the problems we choose to solve, and how well we connect with people on the other side of the screen.
So no, design isn’t dead. But if you think it is—you might be designing for the wrong era.
Inspired by the article “Design Isn’t Dead. You Sound Dumb.” by Josh Mings on UXMag.
Read the original →
Join Vijay on Peerlist!
Join amazing folks like Vijay and thousands of other people in tech.
Create ProfileJoin with Vijay’s personal invite link.
2
11
0