Self-Contained Systems – A Modern Software Architecture Approach

Self-Contained Systems (SCS) are gaining renewed attention in software architecture discussions, especially as organizations look to scale engineering efforts without falling into the common traps of overly complex microservice environments. This approach focuses on building modular, autonomous, and independently deployable units each owning its own UI, business logic, and data.

While not a new concept, Self-Contained Systems were highlighted in recent architectural talks, including industry conferences such as Spring I/O 2025. If you're curious, you can find related presentations and discussion threads online that break down practical implementations of SCS in production systems.

In this article, we'll explore what Self-Contained Systems are, how they differ from traditional microservices, how they are implemented in real systems, and why they may be the architectural direction your team should consider next.

The Problem with Most Microservice Architectures

Microservices promised autonomy and scalability. In reality, they often lead to distributed monoliths systems where services are technically split, but still tightly coupled through shared databases, synchronous calls, and cross-team dependencies.

Common issues include:

• Tight coordination between services for every feature release

• Fragile integrations across APIs

• Shared ownership of data models

• Complex and often brittle deployment pipelines

You still face coordination bottlenecks, deployment freezes, and fragile interdependencies. That’s where Self-Contained Systems step in.

What Are Self-Contained Systems?

A Self-Contained System (SCS) is an architectural unit that includes all the components required to deliver a feature or domain functionality. Each SCS:

• Owns its frontend (UI or API)

• Owns its backend and business logic

• Manages its own database and storage

• Is owned by a single team

• Is developed, deployed, and operated independently

SCSs are typically larger than microservices and focus on vertical slicing cutting through all layers of a specific business capability instead of splitting by technical layers.

How Are Self-Contained Systems Different from Microservices?

While both microservices and SCS promote modularity and independence, their boundaries and assumptions differ.

Microservices often target small functionalities, breaking applications down into many tiny services. Each microservice might focus on a single responsibility say, user authentication or invoice generation. However, they often rely on a shared frontend and may still depend on shared databases or orchestrated workflows. This results in teams needing to synchronize often, even for minor updates.

In contrast, a Self-Contained System slices through the entire vertical of a domain. If one SCS handles the checkout process, it includes the checkout UI, the backend services, the logic for order calculation, and its own order database. The team building it can change, test, and deploy the entire stack independently. There’s no need to coordinate changes with other teams unless integration boundaries change.

SCS avoids shared UI layers, discourages synchronous inter-service calls, and favors asynchronous communication or stable, minimal APIs. This makes it less likely to fall into the "distributed monolith" trap that many microservices ecosystems face.

Technical Implementation of SCS

Here’s what a typical SCS setup looks like from a technical standpoint:

1. Independent Codebases

Each SCS lives in its own codebase, possibly in a monorepo but strictly scoped. It has its own CI/CD pipeline and can be deployed on its own schedule.

2. UI Isolation

Rather than having a centralized frontend pulling from various services, each SCS serves its portion of the UI. In a portal setup, this might be composed using techniques like module federation or reverse proxy routing.

3. Backend Logic

The backend encapsulates domain-specific logic. Business rules are not shared or spread across other systems.

4. Data Isolation

Every SCS owns its database. There are no joins across databases, no shared schemas, and no implicit data dependencies. Any data exchange happens via events or API calls.

5. Communication

Event-driven architectures are common. Instead of synchronous REST calls, systems publish and subscribe to events, reducing coupling and improving resilience.

6. Observability and Operations

Each SCS integrates its own observability stack logs, metrics, alerts. Distributed tracing may be used to stitch together inter-system workflows.

Benefits of Self-Contained Systems

• Reduced Coordination: Teams can develop and release features without waiting on other teams.

• Fault Isolation: Failures in one system don't bring down others.

• Domain Focused Teams: Each team can become an expert in their bounded context.

• Simplified Deployment: No need for cross-service release orchestration.

• Scalability: Systems can be scaled independently based on traffic and usage patterns.

Challenges and Tradeoffs

Implementing SCS also brings its own set of complexities:

• Duplication of Logic: Similar logic or validation might be repeated in multiple systems.

• Data Consistency: You can't rely on strong consistency guarantees across systems.

• Operational Overhead: Monitoring, alerting, and security must be managed per system.

• Governance: Without discipline, systems can diverge in standards and practices.

These tradeoffs are usually acceptable in exchange for autonomy, speed, and long-term maintainability.

When Should You Consider Self-Contained Systems?

You should think about SCS when:

• You have multiple teams working on different product areas.

• Your microservice setup has grown too complex to coordinate.

• You’re trying to scale teams and codebases without creating bottlenecks.

• You want faster, more resilient delivery cycles.

It may not be ideal if you're a small team or if your app is early in development and doesn't yet face complexity from scale.

Final Thoughts

Self-Contained Systems are a reminder that architecture is about ownership, boundaries, and autonomy. They provide a structured way to scale both your systems and your teams.

While microservices tried to bring modularity, SCS delivers on it by embedding full-stack independence into each boundary. Instead of thin services requiring orchestration, you get full features managed by focused, independent teams.

If you're building or evolving a distributed system, it's worth seriously exploring how Self-Contained Systems can improve agility, stability, and team productivity. For further exploration, check out community discussions and conference talks such as those from Spring I/O and other modern system design events.

- Jagadhiswaran Devaraj

📢 Stay Connected & Dive Deep into Tech!

🚀 Follow me for hardcore technical insights on JavaScript, Full-Stack Development, AI, and Scaling Systems:

• 🐦 X (Twitter): @jags

• ✍️ Medium: medium.com/@jwaran78

• 💼 LinkedIn: Jagadhiswaran Devaraj

• 💻 GitHub: github.com/jagadhis

• 🌐 Portfolio: devjags.com

Let’s geek out over code, architecture, and all things in tech!